详情页

当前位置：首页 > 详情页

Comparison of the Application Value for Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease between Color Doppler Flow Quantification Technique and Computed Tomography

9| 导出 | 链接全文 |

文献详情

资源类型：

WOS体系：

Pubmed体系：

收录情况： ◇ SCIE

作者：

机构： [1]Department of Medical Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China. [2]Departmrnt of Nephrology, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo 255000, Shandong, China. [3]Center of Returning Visit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China. [4]Department of CT Magnetic Resonance, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei, China.

出处：

DOI：

ISSN：

摘要：

The aim of this study is to compare the application value for diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) between the color Doppler flow quantification (CDFQ) technique and computed tomography (CT).The clinical data of 88 hospitalized patients treated in the Renal Medicine of our hospital and diagnosed with CKD after pathological examination from June 2020 to June 2021 were selected for the retrospective analysis, and 32 individuals with normal physical examination results in the same period were selected as the control group. All study subjects received CDFQ and 640-slice volume CT examination, and by plotting the ROC curves, the clinical value of different diagnostic modalities was analyzed.The 3D renal volumes between the stage 1 group and control group were significantly different (P < 0.05); the 3D renal volumes between the stage 2 group and control group and between the stage 2 group and stage 1 group were significantly different (P < 0.05); in the comparison between the stage 3 group versus control group/stage 2 group, the RI values, 3D renal volumes, and cortical thicknesses were significantly different (P < 0.05); in the comparison between the stage 4 group versus control group/stage 1 group, the RI values, 3D renal volumes, and cortical thicknesses were significantly different, and between the stage 4 group and stage 2 group, the RI values and cortical thicknesses were significantly different (P < 0.05); in the comparison between the stage 5 group versus control group/stage 1 group/stage 2 group/stage 3 group, the RI values, 3D renal volumes, and cortical thicknesses were significantly different, and between the stage 5 group and stage 4 group, the RI values and 3D renal volumes were significantly different (P < 0.05); among various groups, the measurement indicators of 640-slice volume CT scan were significantly different (P < 0.05); and in terms of disease classification, the AUC value, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity of 640-slice volume CT were higher than those of CDFQ diagnosis.640-slice volume CT has a higher efficacy in diagnosing CKD and can provide a reliable basis for the selection of treatment schemes for CKD patients.Copyright © 2022 Yusen Zhao et al.

语种：

被引次数：

WOS：

PubmedID：

中科院分区：

出版当年[2022]版：

大类 | 4 区医学

小类 | 4 区核医学

最新[2025]版：

无

影响因子： 0 最新[2024版] 0 最新五年平均 0 出版当年[2022版] 0 出版当年五年平均 3.009 出版前一年[2021版]

第一作者：

第一作者机构： [1]Department of Medical Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China.

通讯作者：

通讯机构： [4]Department of CT Magnetic Resonance, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei, China.

推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714)：

APA：

MLA：