高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. [2]Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom. [3]Department of very important person (VIP) Medical Services and Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. [4]Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. [5]Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. [6]Department of Radiotherapy, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Significant progress has been made in the investigation of neoadjuvant immune-chemoradiotherapy (NICRT) and neoadjuvant immune-chemotherapy (NICT) on the outcomes of esophageal cancer patients. To summarize the current developments, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy.A search strategy of prospective studies on esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy was predefined to scan PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and additional major conferences for prospective studies. Efficacy was assessed by pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), and R0 resection rates. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), neoadjuvant therapy completion rate, surgical resection rate, and surgical delay rate. Differences between the NICRT and NICT groups were also analyzed.A total of 38 studies qualified for the analysis. The pooled pCR, MPR, and R0 resection rates were 30, 58, and 99%, respectively. The pCR and MPR in the NICRT vs. NICT group were 38% vs. 28% (p=0.078) and 67% vs. 57% (p=0.181), respectively. The pooled incidence of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was 24% (NICRT,58%, I2 = 61% vs. NICT,18%, I2 = 79%; p<0.001). In addition, the pooled neoadjuvant therapy completion and surgical resection rates were 92% and 85%, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant between the NICRT and NICT groups.Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy is effective and safe in the short term for locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, further randomized trials are needed to confirm which combined model is more favorable.https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021284266, identifier CRD42021284266.Copyright © 2023 Liu, Bao, Yang, Sun, Yuan, Ma, Zhang, Zhai, Wang, Men, Qin, Xue, Wang and Hui.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 免疫学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 免疫学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
最新[2024]版:
Q1 IMMUNOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2024版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2023版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2022版] 出版后一年[2024版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:42329 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1365 更新日期:2025-08-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:河北省石家庄市健康路12号