高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Effects of Beta-Blockers on Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Dialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Nephrol, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China [2]Xingtai Peoples Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Xingtai, Peoples R China [3]Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Sci Res, Jiankang Rd, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Beta-blockers Dialysis Mortality Meta-analysis

摘要:
Background: The effects of beta-blockers are uncertain in dialysis patients. Except antihypertension, beta-blockers may play a unique cardiovascular protective role in the population. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the effects of beta-blockers therapy in adult patients treated with dialysis. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library from inception to May 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies about the role of beta-blockers on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular events, or hospitalizations in dialysis population. Results: Three RCTs and 9 observational studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. The RCTs showed significant association between beta-blockers and reduced all-cause mortality (n = 363; risk ratio [RR] 0.73; 95% CI 0.54-0.97), cardiovascular mortality (n = 314; RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.29-0.68), cardiovascular events (n = 363; RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.31-0.88), or hospitalizations (n = 314; RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.48-0.78) in dialysis patients. The observational studies showed significant difference in all-cause mortality (n = 35,233; hazard ratio [HR] 0.86; 95% CI 0.80-0.92) between beta-blockers and no beta-blockers therapy in patients with dialysis, while the studies showed no difference in cardiovascular mortality (n = 19,413; HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.57-1.11), or cardiovascular events (n = 87,060; HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.50-1.26). Conclusions: beta-blockers seem to be associated with reduced mortality in patients on dialysis. Both the statistical heterogeneity in observational studies and the small number of participants and studies in RCTs limit the strength of these findings. (C) 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 血液学 4 区 泌尿学与肾脏学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 血液学 4 区 泌尿学与肾脏学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Q3 HEMATOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Q3 HEMATOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Nephrol, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [3]Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Sci Res, Jiankang Rd, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, Peoples R China [*1]Department of Scientific Research The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang 050011 (PR China)
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:39770 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1333 更新日期:2025-05-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 河北医科大学第四医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:河北省石家庄市健康路12号