高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Overall survival of patients with KRAS wild-type tumor treated with FOLFOX/FORFIRI +/- cetuximab as the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer A meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of General Surgery,the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. [2]Department of Radiotherapy, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: cetuximab first-line FOLFOX/FORFIRI meta-analysis metastatic colorectal cancer wild-type KRAS

摘要:
The addition of cetuximab to FOLFIRI or FOLFOX as the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was shown to reduce the risk of disease progression and increase the chance of response in patients with KRAS wild-type disease. An updated systematic meta-analysis was undertaken to determine the efficacy of cetuximab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX. Major databases were searched to identify RCTs investigating wild-type KRAS mCRC after the first-line treatment, and treatment with FOLFOX/FORFIRI +/- cetuximab was compared. Data on clinical efficacy and safety were pooled and compared by ORs, HRs, and 95% CIs. Five eligible trials with 1464 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to FOLFOX/FORFIRI +/- cetuximabas the first-line therapy has improved overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR]= 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.93, P= 0.003), progressionfree survival (PFS) (HR= 0.66, 95% CI: 0.56 -0.77, P< 0.00001), and overall response rate (ORR) ( odds ratio [OR]= 2.12, 95% CI: 1.70- 2.65, P< 0.00001). However, Grade 3/4 AE was increased with the OR of 2.76 ( 95% CI: 2.01-3.78, P< 0.00001). The most common grade 3/4 toxicity in the wild-type KRAS population was neutropenia and diarrhea. For cetuximab plus FOLFIRI, there was a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea (OR=1.76, 95% CI: 1.15-2.70, P= 0.01), but there was no significant difference for neutropenia (OR= 1.35, 95% CI: 1.00-1.83, P= 0.05). The addition of cetuximab in mCRC as the first-line treatment is a potential effective approach in the improved outcomes but associated with increased toxicity.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 医学:内科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2024]版:
Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2024版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2017版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2016版] 出版后一年[2018版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of General Surgery,the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of General Surgery,the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. [*1]Department of General Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Health Road No. 12, North Building Street, Qiaodong District, Shijiazhuang, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:42313 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1365 更新日期:2025-08-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:河北省石家庄市健康路12号