高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves survival in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a propensity score matching analysis.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China. [2]Department of General Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction Neoadjuvant treatment Chemoradiotherapy Chemotherapy Propensity score matching analysis

摘要:
To analyze whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) could improve the survival for patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT). Both neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone and chemoradiotherapy before surgery have been shown to improve overall long-term survival for patients with adenocarcinoma in the esophagus or esophagogastric junction compared to surgery alone. It remains controversial whether nCRT is superior to nCT. 170 Patients with locally advanced (cT3-4NxM0) Siewert II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin with or without concurrent radiotherapy in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was used and delivered in 5 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy per week for 5 weeks (total dose of PTV: 45 Gy). 120 Patients were included in the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to compare the effects of nCRT with nCT on survival. With a median follow-up of 41.2 months for patients alive after propensity score matching analysis, the 1- and 3-year OS were 84.8%, 55.0% in nCRT group and 78.3%, 38.3% in nCT group (P = 0.040; HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.02-2.69). The 1- and 3-year PFS were 84.9%, 49.2% in nCRT group and 68.3%, 29.0% in nCT group (P = 0.010; HR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.14-2.85). The pathological complete response (pCR) was 17.0% in nCRT group and 1.9% in nCT group (P = 0.030). No significant difference was observed in postoperative complications between the two groups. The nCRT confers a better survival with improved R0 resection rate and pCR rate compared with nCT for the patients with locally advanced AEG.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 外科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 外科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
Q3 SURGERY
最新[2024]版:
Q2 SURGERY

影响因子: 最新[2024版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2021版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2020版] 出版后一年[2022版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:42313 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1365 更新日期:2025-08-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:河北省石家庄市健康路12号