高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Addition of Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy in Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy vs. Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone for Patients With Unresectable Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ EI

机构: [1]Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. [2]Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention Therapy, Tianjin, China.
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) have become the standard of care in esophageal carcinoma patients who are not surgical candidates. The efficacy of induction chemotherapy (IC) or consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) for unresectable esophageal cancer (EC) treated with CCRT is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published papers to evaluate the potential benefit of IC or CCT for patients with EC.Eligible studies of IC followed by CCRT (IC-CCRT) versus CCRT alone or CCRT followed by CCT (CCRT-CCT) versus CCRT alone were retrieved through extensive searches of the PubMed, Science Direct, Embase, and Cochrane library databases from the establishment of the database to January 2021. Data such as one-, two-, three- and five-year overall survival (OS), local recurrence rate (LRR) and distant metastasis rate (DMR) were collected for meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of IC/CCT. Hazard ratio (HR), odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.Three studies of IC-CCRT versus CCRT alone including 726 EC patients and six studies of CCRT-CCT versus CCRT alone including 1268 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) were finally identified in our analysis. Both IC-CCRT group (HR 0.446, 95% CI 0.287-0.694; P < 0.001) and CCRT-CCT group (HR 0.706, 95% CI 0.530-0.941; P = 0.018) exhibited statistically significant improvement in one-year OS rate compared to CCRT alone, while the two-year OS rate of IC-CCRT (HR 0.803, 95% CI 0.589-1.095; P = 0.166) or CCRT-CCT (HR 0.916, 95% CI 0.716-1.171; P = 0.483) was similar with CCRT alone. However, comparing with CCRT alone, CCRT-CCT group had lower DMR (OR 1.562, 95% CI 1.090-2.240; P = 0.015). Besides, no differences were observed between two groups of CCRT-CCT and CCRT alone in three-year OS rate (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.659-1.096; P = 0.21), five-year OS rate (HR 1.019, 95% CI 0.692-1.499; P = 0.925) and LRR (OR 0.899, 95% CI 0.686-1.179; P = 0.441).This is the first meta-analysis to compare the effects of IC-CCRT or CCRT-CCT versus CCRT alone. This result revealed the short-time instead of long-time survival benefit of additional IC/CCT compared to CCRT alone for patients with unresectable EC. CCRT-CCT provided significant benefits to reduce the risk of distant-metastasis, and might be fit better in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 肿瘤学 2 区 核医学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 肿瘤学 2 区 核医学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
Q1 ONCOLOGY Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
最新[2023]版:
Q1 ONCOLOGY Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2021版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2020版] 出版后一年[2022版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:39770 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1333 更新日期:2025-05-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 河北医科大学第四医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:河北省石家庄市健康路12号