高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Induction TPF followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer: a preliminary analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National ClinicalResearch Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of MedicalSciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China [2]Departmentof Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/NationalClinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academyof Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China [3]Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National ClinicalResearch Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of MedicalSciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China [4]Departmentof Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Centerfor Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and PekingUnion Medical College, Beijing 100021, China [5]National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Hebei Cancer Hospital, ChineseAcademy of Medical Sciences, Langfang 065001, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Hypopharyngeal cancer Concurrent chemoradiotherapy Induction chemotherapy Multi-disciplinary treatment Laryngeal preservation

摘要:
Purpose: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is a standard treatment choice for locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate whether induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by CCRT is superior to CCRT alone to treat locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods and materials: Patients (n = 142) were randomized to receive two cycles of paclitaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil ( TPF) IC followed by CCRT or CCRT alone. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The secondary end points included the larynx-preservation rate, progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and toxicities. Results: Ultimately, 113 of the 142 patients were analyzed. With a median follow-up of 45.6 months (interquartile range 26.8-57.8 months), the 3-year OS was 53.1% in the IC + CCRT group compared with 54.8% in the CCRT group (hazard ratio, 1.004; 95% confidence interval, 0.573-1.761; P = 0.988). There were no statistically significant differences in PFS, DMFS, and the larynx-preservation rate between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3-4 hematological toxicity was much higher in the IC+ CCRT group than in the CCRT group (54.7% vs. 10%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Adding induction TPF to CCRT did not improve survival and the larynx-preservation rate in locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer, but caused a higher incidence of acute hematological toxicities.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
Q2 ONCOLOGY
最新[2024]版:
Q2 ONCOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2024版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2022版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2021版] 出版后一年[2023版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National ClinicalResearch Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of MedicalSciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National ClinicalResearch Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of MedicalSciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China [5]National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Hebei Cancer Hospital, ChineseAcademy of Medical Sciences, Langfang 065001, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Addition of Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy in Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone for Patients With Unresectable Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [2]First-line induction or consolidation chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [3]Addition of Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy in Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy vs. Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone for Patients With Unresectable Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [4]中国淋巴瘤多学科诊疗模式实施指南 [5]Induction sintilimab and chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a proof-of-concept, single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 trial [6]Treatment outcomes after reduction of the target volume of intensity-modulated radiotherapy following induction chemotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A prospective, multi-center, randomized clinical trial [7]Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer [8]Tislelizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with inoperable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled, phase II clinical trial [9]妊娠合并非霍奇金淋巴瘤和慢性HBV感染1例治疗探讨 [10]A Phase III Study of Nimotuzumab Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Loco-regional Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

资源点击量:42329 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1365 更新日期:2025-08-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:河北省石家庄市健康路12号