高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Paclitaxel combined with platinum (PTX) versus fluorouracil combined with cisplatin (PF) in the treatment of unresectable esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and toxicity of two different regimens

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China [2]Department of Medical Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China [3]Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Esophageal cancer concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) paclitaxel fluorouracil efficacy

摘要:
Background: Chemotherapy plays an important role in definitive chemoradiotherapy strategies. However, the most optimal concurrent chemotherapy scheme is still controversial. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel/docetaxel combined with platinum (PTX) and fluorouracil combined with cisplatin (PF) in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) of unresectable esophageal cancer. Methods: The PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Google Scholar and Embase databases were searched by combining subject words and free words through December 31, 2021. The inclusion criteria were pathologically confirmed esophageal cancer studies using CCRT, where the chemotherapy regimen only compared PTX and PF. Quality evaluation and data extraction of studies that met the inclusion criteria were carried out independently. Stata 11.1 software was used to perform the meta analysis. The begger analysis and egger analysis were used to assess publication bias, and the robustness of the pooled results further assessed by the Trim and Fill analysis. Results: After screening, 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. A total of 962 cases were enrolled, including 480(49.9%) in the PTX group and 482 (50.1%) in the PF group. The gastrointestinal reaction to the PF regimen was the most serious (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.80, P=0.003). The complete remission (CR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) of the PTX group were higher than those of the PF group (RR =1.35, 95% CI: 1.03-1.76, P=0.030; RR =1.12, 95% CI: 1.03-1.22, P=0.006; RR =1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09, P=0.022). In terms of the overall survival (OS) rate, the 2-year survival rates of the PTX group were higher than those of the PF group (P=0.005). There was no significant difference in the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates between the two regimens (P=0.064, 0.144, and 0.341, respectively). There may be publication bias for ORR and DCR, and the results are reversed after applying the Trim and Fill method, so the combined results are not robust. Conclusions: PTX may be the preferred regimen for CCRT of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, with better short-term therapeutic effect and 2-year OS rate and lower gastrointestinal toxicity.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 胃肠肝病学 4 区 肿瘤学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 胃肠肝病学 4 区 肿瘤学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Q3 ONCOLOGY
最新[2024]版:
Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Q3 ONCOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2024版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2023版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2022版] 出版后一年[2024版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China [3]Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China [*1]Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China [*2]Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Enteral nutrition to improve nutritional status, treatment tolerance, and outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT): Results of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial (NCT 02399306) [2]Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Taxanes Plus Platinum and Fluorouracil Plus Platinum in the First-Line Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [3]Enteral nutrition to improve nutritional status, treatment tolerance, and outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT): Results of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial (NCT 02399306). [4]图像融合技术下胸段食管鳞癌同步放化疗后复发模式及剂量学研究 [5]Antibiotics Modulate Chemotherapy Efficacy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer [6]Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Lymphotoxin-alpha Derivative With Cisplatin and Fluorouracil in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Controlled, Phase 2b Trial [7]Age plays an important role in the decision of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): a propensity-score matched analysis of multicenter data (3JECROG R-02A) [8]Phase I trial of escalating-dose cisplatin with 5-fluorouracil and concurrent radiotherapy in Chinese patients with esophageal cancer [9]食管癌术后吻合口生物力学分析及加强措施 [10]食管胃吻合口瘘防治进展

资源点击量:42329 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1365 更新日期:2025-08-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:河北省石家庄市健康路12号