高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Radiotherapy combined with chemoimmunotherapy improves survival compared to chemoimmunotherapy alone as first-line treatment for oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Hebei Med Univ, Hebei Clin Res Ctr Radiat Oncol, Dept Radiat Oncol, Hosp 4, Shijiazhuang 050011, Peoples R China [2]Tianjin Med Univ Canc Inst & Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Tianjins Clin Res Ctr Canc,Key Lab Canc Prevent &, Tianjin, Peoples R China [3]Hebei Med Univ, North China Petr Bur Gen Hosp, Dept Oncol, Renqiu, Peoples R China [4]Chinese Acad Med Sci, Canc Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, Beijing, Peoples R China [5]Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Pathol, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Oligometastasis Radiotherapy Chemoimmunotherapy First-line treatment

摘要:
PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy combined with chemoimmunotherapy (RCIT) versus chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) alone as first-line treatment for oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OESCC) at initial diagnosis.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 140 patients newly diagnosed with OESCC who received RCIT or CIT as first-line treatment between June 2018 and December 2021. Among them, 76 patients were in the RCIT cohort and 64 patients in the CIT cohort. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to simulate random allocation.ResultsAfter 1:1 PSM, 61 well-paired patients were selected. The median follow-up duration was 34.7 months (95%CI: 30.6-38.8 months). After PSM, the median PFS for the RCIT and CIT groups was 10.9 (95%CI: 9.4-12.4) months and 7.3 (95%CI: 6.0-8.7) months, respectively (P = 0.004). The median OS for the RCIT and CIT groups was 22.4 (95%CI: 17.5-27.4) months and 13.4 (95%CI: 10.9-15.9) months, respectively (P = 0.031). There were significant differences in PFS (median PFS: 12.9 vs. 8.6 vs. 7.3 months, P = 0.003) between the group receiving radiotherapy (RT) for all lesions, the group receiving RT for partial lesions, and the CIT group, while OS was on the threshold of significance (median OS: 29.4 vs. 17.3 vs. 13.4 months, P = 0.052). No significant differences in the incidence of grade 3 or higher (G3+) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed between the two groups. However, the incidence of G3+ pneumonitis (13.1% vs 1.6%, P = 0.038) were higher in the RCIT group compared to the CIT group.ConclusionRCIT as first-line treatment for OESCC was safe and efficacious. RCIT improved PFS/OS compared to CIT without increasing the overall high grade toxicity rate. However, the increased incidence of pneumonitis due to RT implementation cannot be disregarded.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学 3 区 核医学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学 3 区 核医学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Q3 ONCOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Q3 ONCOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2025版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2024版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Hebei Med Univ, Hebei Clin Res Ctr Radiat Oncol, Dept Radiat Oncol, Hosp 4, Shijiazhuang 050011, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:39770 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1333 更新日期:2025-05-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 河北医科大学第四医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:河北省石家庄市健康路12号