高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Adoptive cellular immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis to inform drug pricing

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Pharm, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China [2]Hebei Med Univ, Sch Pharm, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China [3]Hebei Inst Drug & Med Device Control, Dept Qual Control, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China [4]Hebei North Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pharm, Zhangjiakou, Hebei, Peoples R China [5]Tianjin Univ, Sch Disaster & Emergency Med, Tianjin, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: adoptive cellular immunotherapy metastatic colorectal cancer cost-effectiveness analysis Markov model drug pricing incremental cost-effectiveness ratio

摘要:
Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adoptive cellular immunotherapy (ACI) combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and provide evidence-based support for drug pricing strategies.Methods A Markov model was constructed using data from the NCT03950154 phase III clinical trial, which randomized 202 patients into two groups: ACI combined with oxaliplatin/capecitabine/bevacizumab (n=100) and chemotherapy alone (n=102). Clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events, were analyzed. Costs, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was employed to assess model stability, accompanied by scenario analysis, with price simulations conducted under three willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds (1.5x, 1.94x, and 3x China's per capita gross domestic product [GDP]).Results The ACI group demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared to chemotherapy alone, with a median PFS of 14.8 vs. 9.9 months (hazard ratio [HR]=0.60, p=0.009) and a median OS not reached vs. 25.6 months (HR=0.57, p=0.043). Over a 20-year simulation, the ACI group provided an additional 1.72 QALY, yielding an ICER of $35,881.71/QALY. At the base-case price ($6,819.45 per cycle), ACI remained cost-effective within China's WTP threshold ($36,721.86/QALY). Scenario analysis revealed that extending the simulation time horizon to 10 and 15 years reduced the ICER to $40,804.77/QALY and $37,770.23/QALY, respectively. Systematic cross-validation of 2,448 model combinations (72 control group/34 ACI group survival curves) indicated that 71.84% of scenarios met predefined cost-effectiveness criteria (ICER range: $22,204 - $58,360/QALY). Price sensitivity analysis further demonstrated that cost-effectiveness advantages persisted when ACI cycle costs were reduced to $1,670.33 (corresponding to WTP=1.5xGDP=$18,360.93), $3,271.06 (corresponding to WTP = 1.94xGDP = $23,746.80), and $7,098.9 (corresponding to WTP = 3xGDP = $36,721.86).Conclusion At current pricing, ACI combined with chemotherapy provides significant clinical and economic benefits for Chinese mCRC patients, with cost-effectiveness validated through multidimensional scenario analyses and model evaluations. Further evidence is required to validate and refine the findings.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 肿瘤学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 肿瘤学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2024]版:
Q2 ONCOLOGY
最新[2024]版:
Q2 ONCOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2024版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2025版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2024版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Pharm, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:42329 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1365 更新日期:2025-08-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:河北省石家庄市健康路12号