高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Distinguishing optimal candidates for primary tumor resection in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: A predictive model based on propensity score matching

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Qiao Dong Qu, Shi Jia Zhuang Shi, He Bei Sheng, 050010, China.
出处:

关键词: Metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (mLUAD) Surgery SEER Prognosis factor Risk factor Nomogram

摘要:
Primary tumor resection is associated with survival benefits in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (mLUAD). However, there are no established methods to determine which individuals would benefit from surgery. Therefore, we developed a model to predict the patients who are likely to benefit from surgery in terms of survival.Data on patients with mLUAD were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Depending on whether surgery was performed on the primary tumor, patients were categorized into two groups: cancer-directed surgery (CDS) and no-cancer-directed surgery (No-CDS). Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was utilized to address bias between the CDS and No-CDS groups. The prognostic impact of CDS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. Subsequently, we constructed a nomogram to predict the potential for surgical benefits based on multivariable logistic regression analysis using preoperative factors.A total of 89,039 eligible patients were identified, including 6.4% (5705) who underwent surgery. Following PSM, the CDS group demonstrated a significantly longer median overall survival (mOS) compared with the No-CDS group (23 [21-25] vs. 7 [7-8] months; P < 0.001). The nomogram showed robust performance in both the training and validation sets (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.698 and 0.717, respectively), and the calibration curves exhibited high consistency. The nomogram proved clinically valuable according to decision curve analysis (DCA). According to this nomogram, surgical patients were categorized into two groups: no-benefit candidates and benefit candidates groups. Compared with the no-benefit candidate group, the benefit candidate group was associated with longer survival (mOS: 25 vs. 6 months, P < 0.001). Furthermore, no difference in survival was observed between the no-benefit candidates and the no-surgery groups (mOS: 6 vs. 7 months, P = 0.9).A practical nomogram was developed to identify optimal CDS candidates among patients with mLUAD.© 2024 The Authors.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 综合性期刊
小类 | 4 区 综合性期刊
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 综合性期刊
小类 | 4 区 综合性期刊
JCR分区:
出版当年[2024]版:
最新[2023]版:
Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2024版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2023版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Qiao Dong Qu, Shi Jia Zhuang Shi, He Bei Sheng, 050010, China.
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:39770 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1333 更新日期:2025-05-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 河北医科大学第四医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:河北省石家庄市健康路12号