高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

A randomised controlled trial in comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes between hands-and-knees delivery position and supine position in China

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ SSCI

机构: [1]Department of Obstetrics, the Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China [2]Department of Obstetrics, Shenzhen hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China [3]Department of Obstetrics, Baoan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shenzhen, China [4]Department of Obstetrics, Cangxian People's Hospital, Cangzhou, China [5]Department of Obstetrics, Dongchang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Liaocheng, China [6]Department of Obstetrics, Gongan People's Hospital, Jingzhou, China [7]Department of Obstetrics, Cangzhou People's Hospital, Cangzhou, China [8]Department of Obstetrics, Dongguan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Dongguan, China [9]Baoan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Baoan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shenzhen, China [10]Department of Obstetrics, Juxian People's Hospital, Rizhao,China [11]Department.of Obstetric, East Part of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China [12]Department of Obstetrics, Nanhai People's Hospital, Foshan, China [13]Department of Obstetrics, Haikou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Haikou, China [14]Shenzhen hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: China Hands and knees delivery position Maternal and foetal outcomes Per-protocol analysis Supine position

摘要:
Background: the supine position is the most frequently offered for birth delivery in China and many other countries, but the hands-and-knees position is now gaining prominence with doctors in China. This study aims to examine the differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes among low-risk women who gave birth either in the hands-and-knees position or the supine position. Methods: a randomised controlled trial was conducted in 11 hospitals in China from May to December in 2012. In total, 1400 women were recruited and randomly allocated to either the experimental group (n=700, 446 completed the protocol) who delivered in hands-and-knees position and the control group (n=700, 440 completed the protocol) who delivered in supine position. Women who could not maintain the randomised position during the second stage of labour were allowed to withdraw from the study. The primary maternal outcome measured was rate of episiotomy. Secondary outcomes included degree of perineum laceration, rate of emergency caesarean section, rate of shoulder dystocia, and duration of labour, postpartum bleeding, neonatal Apgar score, and the rate of neonatal asphyxia. Because outcome data were only collected for women who gave birth in the randomised position, per-protocol analyses were used to compare groups. The primary outcome, episiotomy, was also compared between groups using logistic regression adjusting for maternal age, gestational age at birth, whether the woman was primiparous, the process of second stage of labour and birthweight. Findings: as compared with the control group, the experimental group had lower rates of episiotomy and second-degree perineum laceration (including episiotomy), and higher rates of intact perineum and first-degree perineum laceration, with a longer duration of second stage of labour. No significant differences were found in the amount of postpartum bleeding, shoulder dystocia, neonatal asphyxia and neonatal Apgar scores at 1 minute and 5 minutes. Adjusted for maternal age, gestational age, parity, duration of second stage of labour and birth weight, the hands-and-knees position reduced the need for episiotomy (OR=0.024, p < 0.001). Conclusions: this study provided evidence that women who could maintain the hands-and-knees position during the second stage of labour had lower rates of episiotomy and second-degree perineum laceration (including episiotomy). Both midwives and obstetricians are suggested to learn the skills to assist women with delivery in this position.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 护理
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 护理
JCR分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
Q1 NURSING
最新[2024]版:
Q1 NURSING

影响因子: 最新[2024版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2017版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2016版] 出版后一年[2018版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Obstetrics, the Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:42329 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1365 更新日期:2025-08-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:河北省石家庄市健康路12号