高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Effects of upright positions during the second stage of labour for women without epidural analgesia: A meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ SSCI

机构: [1]School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China [2]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China [3]Health Science Library, Peking University, Beijing, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: childbirth maternal health meta-analysis nursing systematic review upright position

摘要:
Aims To assess the effects of upright positions on maternal outcomes for women without epidural analgesia in comparison with recumbent positions during the second stage of labour. Background Upright positions have many physiological advantages. The underlying benefits and risks of upright positions during the second stage of labour have been reported in many studies but the results are divergent. Design A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Data sources The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and ProQuest databases were systematically searched from inception to 17 June 2019. Review methods We conducted the quality appraisal using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and performed meta-analyses using the Review Manager 5.3 software. The primary outcomes were instrumental vaginal delivery and the duration of the second stage of labour. Results Overall, 12 studies including 4,314 women were included. Upright positions significantly decreased the rate of instrumental vaginal delivery (risk ratio [RR] = 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.93), shortened the active pushing phase (mean difference [MD] = -8.16 min, 95% CI -16.29 to -0.02), decreased the rate of severe perineal trauma (RR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.87) and episiotomy (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.92), but significantly increased the rate of second-degree perineal trauma (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.10-1.90). However, there was no significant difference in the duration of the second stage of labour or postpartum haemorrhage. Conclusions Upright positions are beneficial for improving maternal outcomes. Several results should be considered with caution. Researchers need to clarify the definition of upright positions and conduct large, robust studies in the future to provide stronger evidence. Impact This meta-analysis explores a crucial issue in intrapartum care and clarifies the benefits and possible risks of upright positions in the second stage of labour. Midwives and obstetricians are encouraged to apply upright positions depending on women's preferences and labour progress but should take measures to prevent perineal trauma.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 护理
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 护理
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q1 NURSING
最新[2023]版:
Q1 NURSING

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China [*1]School of Nursing, Peking University, #38 Xueyuan Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100191, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:39804 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1333 更新日期:2025-05-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 河北医科大学第四医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:河北省石家庄市健康路12号