高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Elective nodal irradiation provides a superior therapeutic modality for lymph node positivity esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy versus involved-field irradiation

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Radiat Oncol, 12 Jiankang Rd, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: esophageal neoplasms intensity-modulated prognosis propensity score radiotherapy survival analysis

摘要:
This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved-field irradiation (IFI) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). From January 2006 to December 2012, 644 patients (ENI=157, IFI=487) with stage I to IVa ESCC (AJCC 2010) at our institution were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to identify 471 (ENI=157, IFI=314) well-balanced patients for comparison. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome of the study. After PSM, the median OS was 26.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.9-35.7) for the ENI arm versus 21.5 (95% CI: 17.9-25.1) months in the IFI arm. The 1-, 3-, 5-year OS were 77.1%, 42.0%, and 26.1% for the ENI arm versus 73.2%, 32.2%, and 19.0% for the IFI arm (P=.020). ENI was a significant independent predictor of 5-year OS (1.301 [1.052-1.609]; P=.015). Furthermore, patients with stage I/II ESCC or lymph node (LN) positivity in the ENI arm had significantly better 5-year OS than their counterparts in the IFI arm. In addition, for LN positivity patients treated with definitive radiotherapy alone, ENI tended to prolong OS compared with IFI (P=.035). The 2 arms were comparable in toxicities. Using IMRT, ENI is superior to IFI in improving OS of ESCC patients, with acceptable toxicities that were comparable to those to IFI, especially for LN positivity ESCC patients treated with definitive irradiation alone. These results should be confirmed in a large randomized study comparing these 2 modalities.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 医学:内科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2024]版:
Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2024版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Radiat Oncol, 12 Jiankang Rd, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Radiat Oncol, 12 Jiankang Rd, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China [*1]Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:42329 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1365 更新日期:2025-08-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:河北省石家庄市健康路12号