高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Endostar (rh-endostatin) improves efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. [2]Department of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. [3]Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. [4]Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: chemoradiotherapy endostar meta-analysis NSCLC

摘要:
We aimed to clarify the benefits of the addition of rh-endostatin into concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus CCRT alone for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by a meta-analysis.PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Wanfang and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were systematically screened from inception to November 2020 using the prespecified terms. Prospective trials (evaluating or) comparing the efficacy of endostar combined with CCRT and CCRT for locally advanced NSCLC were included. The primary endpoints were risk ratios (RRs) for objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The secondary endpoints were RRs for overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs).Ten studies with 716 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Endostar combined with CCRT significantly improved ORR and DCR compared with CCRT. The RRs of ORR and DCR for endostar combined with CCRT versus CCRT were 1.263 (95% CI: 1.137-1.403, p < 0.001) and 1.274 (95% CI: 1.124-1.444, p < 0.001), respectively. Endostar combined with CCRT significantly improved one-year survival rate compared with CCRT with pooled RR = 1.113 (95% CI: 1.006-1.231, p = 0.038). Endostar combination treatments had similar incidences of main adverse events compared with CCRT (p > 0.05).Endostar combined with CCRT is associated with significantly higher ORR, DCR and survival rate than CCRT with similar incidences of main adverse events in NSCLC.© 2021 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学 3 区 呼吸系统
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 肿瘤学 4 区 呼吸系统
JCR分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
Q3 ONCOLOGY Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
最新[2023]版:
Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Q3 ONCOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2021版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2020版] 出版后一年[2022版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. [2]Department of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. [*1]National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Panjiayuan Nanli No.17, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:39770 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1333 更新日期:2025-05-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 河北医科大学第四医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:河北省石家庄市健康路12号